4 hours ago
The charge "x-ray accomplice'' refers to the fact that you knew full well that a player was using x-ray and did not report it to staff. Instead, you chose to advise them to use it carefully instead. I think this attitude towards x-ray speaks volumes, and is also a reflection of your own choices, using x-ray carefully.
Per your request, I summoned 2 other admins to take a look at all your past mining on this server, on their own time with fresh, unbiased eyes. Both admins agreed that your mines were suspicious and likely x-ray was used. We all agree beyond a reasonable doubt that it was more than just luck on numerous occasions.
Aside from the x-ray accomplice and x-ray use, the way your appeal is written is highly suspect of AI usage, which is against ban appeal rule #7.
All things considered, your appeal is denied.
If you would like to appeal again, please write the entire thing only using your own words, and you can also add on to address the use of AI in your first appeal.
Per your request, I summoned 2 other admins to take a look at all your past mining on this server, on their own time with fresh, unbiased eyes. Both admins agreed that your mines were suspicious and likely x-ray was used. We all agree beyond a reasonable doubt that it was more than just luck on numerous occasions.
Aside from the x-ray accomplice and x-ray use, the way your appeal is written is highly suspect of AI usage, which is against ban appeal rule #7.
All things considered, your appeal is denied.
If you would like to appeal again, please write the entire thing only using your own words, and you can also add on to address the use of AI in your first appeal.

